Skip to content

susanneah

Studies

Categories

  • 1. Week Eight
  • 100. Personal
  • 2. Week Ten
  • 200. Uncategorized
  • 2016
  • 2016, August
  • 2017
  • 2018 digitalnomadism story1
  • 3. Week Eleven
  • 4. Week Twelve
  • Aug-Sept 2015 17 items
  • end 2015
  • Ideas, old & new, end-2015 to forever, I guess
  • January
  • January 2016
  • P
  • writing 2008
  • writing 2009
  • writing 2011
  • writing 2013 – 2015
  • WRITING 2013 – 2015
  • Writings 2007

Archives

  • October 2022
  • May 2021
  • January 2019
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • March 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • May 2015

my new precious delicious

RSS

  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Recent Posts

  • Jindabyne and Raymond Carver
  • Wasteman, 2020
  • 8 Wildly Successful Old-Agers, 2021
  • Gatherup work – 2 eco-poems, 2018, & notes
  • REAL LIFE IN THE TIME OF DIGITAL NOMADISM

My Precious Pages

  • 1. Studies
  • Australian Poetry

My Precious Calendar

April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Oct    

Recent Comments

susanneah's avatarsusanneah on Wasteman, 2020
Jamie Dedes's avatarJamie Dedes on 3. LP W8 Q2: Aesthetic Us…
susanneah's avatarsusanneah on Pathan: A German Man. Chapter…
susanneah's avatarsusanneah on Week 6 no 1

capable

13. LP W12 A Four Websites

May 30, 2015May 31, 2015 susanneahaesthetics, capable, design, form, function, logo, persuasive, webdesignLeave a comment
Image 1. OECD website, 2015. Screenshot. S. Harford, 2015.
Image 1. OECD website, 2015. Screenshot. S. Harford, 2015 

 

Image 1,a current OECD website (2015), is “presumed” credible because in using this source I have found it “trustworthy…truthful”. This site may also possibly be “fair and unbiased”, and thus “credible” (Fogg, 2003).

 

Image 2. WAKEFIELD website, 2015. Screenshot. S. Harford, 2015.
Image 2. WAKEFIELD website, 2015. Screenshot. S. Harford, 2015

Image 2, the current Wakefield website (2015) is categorised “reputed”, and credible  for two reasons. First, this site was recommended by a close friend. Secondly,  this useful site has “expertly” performed exactly as the friend described (Fogg, 2003).

 

 

Image 3.website V&A. Screenshot. S. Harford, 2015.
Image 3. website V&A. Screenshot. S. Harford, 2015

Image 3, one current V & A Museum website (2015) of many categorised credible, on the “surface”. For many reasons: first, and key reason: the site oftens changes, is always superbly designed, extremely decorative and interesting. Second, the site  “attempts to persuade”, although softly. Third, the site has “convinced” me, previously, that visiting this site will entertain, amuse and inform. Fourth, the site is “competent… professional”. Fifth, this site often has the power to relax, or to “influence” me, so is on my list of most-visited  (Fogg, 2003).

Image 4. Davies, V & A logo. 2015.
Image 4. Davies, V & A logo. 2015.
Image 5. Starbucks website, 2015. Screenshot. S. Harford, 2015.
Image 5. Starbucks website, 2015. Screenshot. S. Harford, 2015.

 

Image 4, one current Starbucks website (2015) categorised “earned”.  My, and others’ experiences in using this website positively changed my perceptions. About Starbucks the institution, how I felt about using Starbucks and whether I support Starbucks’ methods of operation. As Fogg (2003) says, this is a successful site which changed my thoughts about Starbucks, and about the Web. It has:

 

  • contradicted my hunches about credibility
  • generated discussions and arguments about credibility
  • lead me to form new hypotheses about credibility

    Image 6. marino, 2015. starbucks logo deviant art, 2015.
    Image 6. marino, 2015. starbucks logo deviant art, 2015.
  • motivated me to more fully investigate credibility
  • changed the way I analyse Web sites
  • changed the way I would design Web sites

Reference

Davies, H. (2011). V & A logo. Hannah Davies: Why Not Associates. .Retrieved from https://hannahdavies27.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/why-not-assosiates/

Fogg, B. (2003). Credibility and the World Wide Web. Persuasive Technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Amsterdam: Kaufmann Publishers.

Marino, C. (2015) Image. Starbucks mermaid logo.             Deviant Art.com. Retrieved from http://cory-marino.deviantart.com/art/Starbucks-Logo-Mermaid-Redes-155591707

OECD. (May, 2015). Website. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/

Starbucks. (May, 2015). Website. Retrieved from http://www.starbucks.com/

V & A. (May, 2015).Website: Exhibitions. [On-line Newsletter] Retrieved from http://www.vam.ac.uk/whatson/type/exhibitions/

WAKEFIELD. (May, 2015). Website. [On-line News Service] Uncubed.com. Retrieved from http://uncubed.com/wakefield/

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Like Loading...
Aside
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • susanneah
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • susanneah
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d